Last Updated on
Do you think keyphrase usage destroys well-written content?
Well, you’re right. Up to a point.
Way back in 2011, Lee Odden wrote “Content Strategy and the Dirty Lie About SEO.” At the end of the post, he posed the question – the question that’s been debated ever since “writing for search engines” started:
Do you think SEO ruins content?
My first reaction was, “Of course not. Good SEO writing is good writing — period.”
I still feel the same way.
But…the haters have a point.
Six years later, there’s still a bunch of SEO writing B.S. floating around:
- Focus on one keyphrase per page, and repeat it at least X times.
- Focus on X keyword density (why won’t keyword density die?)
- Include a keyword every X words.
- Exact-match your keyphrase at least X times in your copy.
Maybe you believe some of this B.S., too (it’s OK. This is a judgement-free zone.)
This B.S. is why some SEO copy is horrible. Is it any wonder why some folks think SEO ruins everything?
So, here’s the real deal:
Yes, SEO can completely decimate content — if you’re doing it wrong.
When the content is written/optimized by someone who has no idea what they’re doing
Most keyphrase-stuffed content I read comes from folks operating on incorrect information.
They do what their clients tell them (for instance, focus on one keyphrase per page) without knowing it’s wrong. These writers don’t know there’s a better way, so they keep doing the same (incorrect) things. Over and over and over.
The result is stuffed, stilted-sounding content that has no conversion flow. The page doesn’t position. The page doesn’t convert. It’s sad.
Sadly, many writers think ALL SEO writing is poorly-written content. So, here’s a news flash:
Folks, if you ever think, “This post sounds bad. I had to work hard to add all those keyphrases,” you’re doing it wrong.
When the content is written “for Google,” without readers in mind
Raise your hand if you’ve been asked to write “1,000 words for Google.”
Yeah, me too.
Sadly, some folks believe that following a strict writing formula will help them magically position. These folks don’t care about the content’s readability. They only care about the keyphrase usage.
They may even come right out and say, “I don’t care if anyone reads this. I just want the page to position.”
This magical SEO copywriting formula may include things like:
- Specific word counts because “all posts should be X words for Google.”
- Exact matching a nonsensical long-tail keyphrase multiple times (for instance, [portland relocation real estate oregon].
- Bolding or italicizing words that shouldn’t be bolded or italicized.
- Repeating all keyphrases X times in the first paragraph.
If you find yourself following a weird writing formula that makes the content read like gibberish, know it’s not true SEO writing. What’s more, following a writing formula won’t help you position. The best bet is to learn the right way to do things and throw those useless old rules out the window.
Don’t believe me? Check out Google’s Quality Raters Guidelines and see how Google defines low-quality content.
When the Titles are filled with keyphrases, with no conversion focus
This is a pet peeve of mine.
I’ve discussed before how overly-optimized Titles are an inefficient branding method. The search results page is your first conversion opportunity. A Title that’s chock-full of keyphrases isn’t as persuasive as one that’s benefit-rich:
GEICO’s “you could save $500+” is a fantastic benefit statement, and blow’s Progressive’s keyword-focused Title out of the water. Esurance is a runner-up since they include the benefit “fast” — but the Title could still be better.
Need more “good” and “bad” Title examples? Here’s a great post from Search Engine Watch.
SEO doesn’t ruin content. It’s “stupid” SEO that messes things up
Smart SEO doesn’t ruin good content. It enhances it – making it easier to be found in search engines and shared via social media. If you’ve mastered the art of online writing for both engines and people, you have a very valuable skill set.
On the flip side, yes, stupid SEO will ruin content. And your conversions, too. As my father used to say, “You can’t make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear” – and repeating a keyword incessantly will not suddenly transform the page into “quality content.”
It reminds me of what some folks say about sales copy being too “sales-y.” There’s a way to include a call-to-action that gently leads someone to the next action step. And there’s a (wrong) way to do it that beats them over the head with hyped language, bold and italics (Hmm. now that I think about it, what IS it about bolded and italicized text?).
What do you think? Is SEO the death of good writing?